web.alive

The issue for me would be less to do with the convenience or otherwise of getting to the event. The fact that a live event can be hard to get to, or relatively expensive, is usually held up as a negative, but many people I think would see it as a treat, to be planned for and saved up for. The question for me is to what extent an immersive environment could offer either an equivalent experience for the spectator/consumer in terms of ‘liveness’ (given that there is no actual direct contact between human beings taking place), or an alternative experience for the spectator/consumer that might be considered equally meaningful on other terms. At this stage I don’t know the answer, but I’m very interested to hear views on the subject.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Posted October 5, 2009 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Until the concept and use of the Virtual Spaces gains wide adoption a physical real world event to publicize this fact seems inevitable. We will be conducting Studio and road-show to promote the AAL solution throughout the EU. It will happen; the question is when!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>